Free initial chat

Free Initial Chat

Complete this form if you would like a free, no obligation conversation with a solicitor.

WIPO publishes Jurisprudential Overview 3.0 - including over 20 decisions made by Matthew Harris

Jun 7, 2017

Author: Chloe

The WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions is the premier global jurisprudential Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy ("UDRP") resource, covers numerous frequently raised key substantive and procedural topics by distilling the collective wisdom of tens of thousands of WIPO domain name cases decided over the span of well over a decade. Hardly a domain name case is filed by trademark counsel or decided by panelists nowadays without consultation of or citation to the WIPO Overview. As the Overview’s last “2.0” edition dates back to 2011, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center has been investing considerable effort in a "from-the-ground-up" update of this jurisprudential resource.

WIPO staff and two preeminent WIPO UDRP panelists have given a timely preview of the WIPO Overview 3.0. Not only will the revised WIPO Overview inform users of updates to UDRP jurisprudence over the five years since its last revision, but it should also establish benchmarks for ICANN’s policy.

Matthew's decisions that were included in the overview:

RapidShare AG and Christian Schmid v. majeed randi, WIPO Case No. D2010-1089

The State of Tennessee, USA v. (DOMAIN NAME 4 SALE) DOMAIN-NAME-4-SALE eMAIL baricci@attglobal.net, WIPO Case No. D2008-0640

Çelik Motor Ticaret A.S. v. ONUNO L.L.C, WIPO Case No. D2015-0369

Research in Motion Limited v. One Star Global LLC, WIPO Case No. D2009-0227

Research in Motion Limited v. One Star Global LLC, WIPO Case No. D2009-0227

Johnson & Johnson v. Ebubekir Ozdogan, WIPO Case No. D2015-1031

Paris Hilton v. Deepak Kumar, WIPO Case No. D2010-1364

St Andrews Links Ltd v. Refresh Design, WIPO Case No. D2009-0601

Guccio Gucci S.p.A. v. Zhiyuan Zou, Zouzhi Zhou , Fujian Anfu, WIPO Case No. D2012-0888

Wendy Sue Ansel, Owner- Rocks and Runes v. Jerome Lacharite, WIPO Case No. D2015-2362

Owens Corning v. NA, WIPO Case No. D2007-1143

FOSS A/S, FOSS NIRSystems INC v. fossnirsystems.com c/o Whois IDentity Shield /Admin, Domain, WIPO Case No. D2008-1256

LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. / Domains Secured, LLC, WIPO Case No. D2011-1857

Weber-Stephen Products LLC v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Daniela Gebauer, Kitchenhelpers GmbH, WIPO Case No. D2017-0118

Dr. lng. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. Gaurav Khanna, Carnity, WIPO Case No. D2014-1618

BML Group Limited v. Rikard Beach, Proxy My Whois AB, WIPO Case No. D2015-1897

McMullan Bros., Limited, Maxol Limited, Maxol Direct Limited Maxol Lubricants Limited, Maxol Oil Limited Maxol Direct (NI) Limited v. Web Names Ltd, WIPO Case No. D2004-0078

Bacchus Gate Corporation d/b/a International Wine Accessories v. CKV and Port Media, Inc., WIPO Case No. D2008-0321

Mrs. Eva Padberg v. Eurobox Ltd., WIPO Case No. D2007-1886

Research In Motion Limited v. Privacy Locked LLC/Nat Collicot, WIPO Case No. D2009-0320

RapidShare AG, Christian Schmid v. PrivacyAnywhere Software, LLC, Mikhail Berdnikov (Protected Domain Services Customer ID: DSR-2262893, Protected Domain Services Customer ID: DSR-2092987) and RapidShare AG, Christian Schmid v. Winsoul, Inc., Aleksey Atushev; (Protected Domain Services Customer ID: DSR-2239262), WIPO Case No. D2010-0894

Green Bay Packers v. Moniker etc, WIPO Case No. D2016-1455

HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG, HUGO BOSS AG v. I Market and Design LLC, WIPO Case No. D2014-2064

Matthew Harris

Joint Head of Intellectual Property and Dispute Resolution

Matthew undertakes a wide range of intellectual property and information technology work but specialises in IP and IT litigation, advising and acting for clients that range from SME’s, to large multi-national companies. 

He currently sits on the Law Society’s Intellectual Property Law Committee, where he has for example led the Law Society’s discussions with the Law Commission on the proposed IP Threats Bill.

Matthew is an internationally recognised expert in domain name law and practice.  He has been appointed by WIPO, Nominet and the Czech Arbitration Court to decide domain name disputes, having decided over 350 cases to date. Read more.